Talk:Security policy of the Enrique Peña Nieto administration

Value judgements and future facts
This article refer to future facts not actual facts. As a politician, Enrique Peña Nieto tries to give some clues to the members and supporters of PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party). But this is an encyclopedia, I consider that this article can have elements to be considered "propagandistic" or a "parisan contribution" reflecting the opinion or interests of a PRI suporter. --Davius (talk) 23:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Enrique Peña Nieto's proposal of prioritizing the reduction of homicides, kidnappings, and drug-related violence as oppose to attacking Mexico's drug trafficking organizations head-on is FACT until stated otherwise. His security policy has been covered to detail by a number of renown agencies and newspapers, and I strongly believe this article has (some) encyclopedic value. This article is not trying to promote a specific political agenda. In all honesty, I have my doubts if you actually read the whole article. Did you? Apparently you didn't. I made sure to conclude both sides of the debate (yes, his security policy is something that concerns Mexico and the international community). As you might know, I'm a Mexican Drug War geek; promoting my personal agenda is not something I want to do here. I also wrote about Andrés Manuel López Obrador's security policy. Please be more careful when labeling someone.


 * Now, please be explicit WP:BOLD. Tell me where the article is "propagandistic." You can check the sources on your own to see that everything is well-sourced. If your argument is that the article is "trying to predict the future," I can somewhat concede with you on that. However, I feel that readers would be highly interested in what the security policy consists and what are the expectations (all of it according to experts, of course). When EPN reaches office, we can keep the core themes and move on to his police reforms, up-to-date analysis, and current events.


 * If I may, please read WP:CRYSTAL. "It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced." ComputerJA (talk) 05:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)