Talk:Sedition/Archive 1

Sedition and War
If the United States has not declared war, like in Iraq, are acts that interfere with the military still considered sedition? Acumensch 14:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Merger Proposal
I propose that Seditionist be merged into this article. 'Seditionist' is a stub article with highly related content, and no citations.

Dialectric (talk) 22:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Aside from the first sentence, there's nothing to merge. I'm all for it. MrZaius  talk  04:39, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Agree. Not that there's much to add - one sentence in the intro? --IdiotSavant (talk) 12:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Agree, doesn't appear to be any content (or likely potential content) that wouldn't be better suited to this article anyway. ~ mazca  t 12:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I've completed the merge. Dialectric (talk) 14:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Smith Act unused since 1961? really?
The article states: Although unused since at least 1961, the "Smith Act" remains a Federal law. Is that really the case, particularly in light of the subsequent paragraphs about Laura Berg and (separately) the Hutaree? Those sure look to me like post-1961 applications of the Smith Act to me, just based upon reading the article. But then, I'm no expert. Perhaps there is some distinction between "Smith Act" sedition and other laws (in the US) regarding sedition. If so, that needs to be explained in more detail for the sake of lay people like me. --TravisM (talk) 21:58, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

See also section
This seems very much random or out of context, any ideas to fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.32.118.79 (talk) 19:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

What it really is:
Zapping/undermining, established platforms, in such a manner as to cause severe collaterol damage onto those not a direct target. (ie: pertains to large collaterol damage in relation to the event and is therefore in relation to a potencial act of terrorism). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.209.217.235 (talk) 16:14, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

This seems very vague/unclear. In the absence of a citation, I'm going to remove the note.--Tcgriffin (talk) 14:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Oscar Lopez Rivera and Seditious Conspiracy
Labeling OLR as a political prisoner has been stated to be a biased opinion. While his sisters opinion as to why he turned down the clemency offer is interesting, the reality has more ominous tones. OLR refused to forswear violence even though the option he seeks has been voted in plebiscites in Puerto Rico with over 85% of the adults of voting age taking part.

In addition, the resurgence of the use of Seditious Conspiracy in charging individuals was because there were few other federal charges that one could use to pursue against organizations like the FALN who killed individuals with bombing. There were no federal murder charges, and in addition, it is difficult to convict a group with murder when the details of who did what are murky, but you know the details of who belonged to the group. In the case of the FALN, a few of the individuals, for example Haydee Torres Beltran were specifically convicted of killing an individual with a bomb, because her fingerprints tied her to the room where the bomb was placed, the morning the bomb was placed. She was seen in the room at the spot where the bomb was placed, etc. In the case of the Fraunces Tavern bombing, no such details were available, but the FALN claimed responsibility for the bombing at the time.Rococo1700 (talk) 02:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Sedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120118045251/http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200705071751/sedition_law_to_be_repealed to http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200705071751/sedition_law_to_be_repealed

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Sedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.oneindia.in/2011/02/10/binayaksens-mother-breaks-down-on-hearing-hcverdict-aid0126.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120912195542/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Cartoonist-Aseem-Trivedi-refuses-to-take-bail-sent-to-judicial-custody-till-Sept-24/Article1-927390.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Cartoonist-Aseem-Trivedi-refuses-to-take-bail-sent-to-judicial-custody-till-Sept-24/Article1-927390.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100602065539/http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/UploadFiles/Publications/Publication_128_353_PR%20SED%202.pdf to http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/UploadFiles/Publications/Publication_128_353_PR%20SED%202.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adl.org/NR/exeres/6636B995-3355-4D28-9FD0-07B7FA2FE153%2CDB7611A2-02CD-43AF-8147-649E26813571%2Cframeless.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051031123750/http://www.law.gov.au/agd/Department/Publications/publications/ICCPR3/articles/article20.pdf to http://www.law.gov.au/agd/Department/Publications/publications/ICCPR3/articles/article20.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

New article on Tukde Tukde Gang
A new article on Tukde Tukde Gang is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanhaiyaa Kumar (talk • contribs) 03:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)