Talk:See-Low

A Merge was proposed, and I respond
At the discussion of Cee-lo, I posted a response to the suggestion that this page be merged into that page. I don't find the rules or description at Cee-lo are sufficiently established for the historical game of See-Low to be merged in, or given any kind of inferior status. See here for discussion: Opposing The Merge
 * Not sure what the point of posting here is, since the only way anyone is going to find this article is through the cee-lo page (as nothing else links here), but I wanted to let you know that a merge proposal is not meant to confer "inferior status". It just means that we don't need two articles about the same game, and the other spelling is more common. Kafziel Talk 00:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC)