Talk:See-through clothing

Photo
The photo should be replaced with one more appropriate - the current one is obviously meant to be pornographic. 220.233.194.252 (talk) 07:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not censored but if you can find a better alternative to the current picture you can be bold and change it, or alternatively suggest an alternate here on the talk page and someone may change it for you. You can search Wikimedia Commons for free images to be used in the article.--Commander Keane (talk) 10:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, even if it's appropriate I think that it's mislabeled. It's not a sheer fabric, it's just see-through due to the fact that it's wet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.163.7 (talk) 02:42, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

History
What is here is very short-sighted. At the least we could begin with Rudi Gernreich and chiffon blouses in the Sixties. In the early Seventies a lace blouse with or without a skin colored layer under it was fashionable. Disco fashions included clear vinyl jeans over underwear. But let us not forget the diaphanous gowns of the Directoire as well.HollyI (talk) 20:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

2008
The reference to see through as starting in 2008 merely shows the age of the author. The trend comes and goes. No bra was popular in the late 60s and early 70s. See through and no bra got my high school teacher sent home in 1969. The road back to bras started in Canada with a minimal see through bra advertised as "dici or nothing". The thickness of current bras would have been called falsies. Covid seems to have gotten many women used to freedom and after 50 years women have returned to owning their own bodies. 2001:1970:5164:3D00:DCA4:A7C4:A849:2C98 (talk) 02:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)