Talk:Seeing Like a State

Untitled
The main quotes and book reviews in this article come from Scott's detractors. This ignores the importance and appreciation of the book within sociology, particularly science and technology studies. The negative parts of the reviews come mainly from reviewers' defenses of nation-states or free markets in general, which address Scott's anarchism more than the main contribution of the book (the main contribution is in the concepts "high modernism", legibility, simplification, miniaturization, visual aesthetics of modernism, and metis). Perhaps I can find time to make a thorough edit. ---P
 * I agree with this assessment to the degree that I added the NPOV banner. I think the article needs to provide a synopsis and a description of the books considerable influence in addition to criticisms.  I'm an Inclusionist so I won't cut anything yet. Groceryheist (talk) 06:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I agree this article is lacking, and I agree with the previous comments that the reviews are largely critics. Scott is commonly taught in anthropology courses because he provides a reasoned critique of the state. The article should minimally include a more robust summary oof the key arguments in the book.Dranthrop (talk) 16:51, 17 December 2019 (UTC)17Dec2019 Dranthrop