Talk:Seekers (novel series)

Nisa Character Section To Be Elaborated!
Someone added "Nisa" to the Characters, and I decided to leave it, since she is an important character, at least in the beginning. Whoever, it heavily needs to be elaborated, as there's only two sentences. So now with the book out, and if you're looking for something to contribute to, that is the section we should be working on!

Moving the Seekers article
I moved Seekers by Erin Hunter to Seeker (novel series). That is how the Warriors page is listed, so I think that this is a better place than before. Epass (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, that's a good idea, although keep in mind that we don't have to follow the Warriors article step by step. If all of the series of books there are articles about have (novel series) after their name, then that's good, but if all of them have the "by author's name", then it'd best to leave it alone.


 * But I like the way you did it. It's more neat and organized. Thanks!


 * Bookwormreader (talk) 17:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

The Quest Begins published early!
They Seemed To Have Released It Early In A Bookstore I Go To... WAY EARLY... They Had Outcast From Warriors Also... I Bought The Book And Read It But I Am Not Sure If I Should Make And Article For It... Should I? Pgcool (talk) 01:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, if you're going to capitalize every single word of your article, then please don't make a new one! And even if you're not, I don't know. I think it's better if you just wait until it really comes out in bookstores for everyone to read, so the whole community can participate.


 * Moreover, I kind of like having just one article so far for the Seekers series, without all the additional articles about each book seperately, articles about each character separately and so on.... Of course I know sooner or later somebody will want to create a detailed article based on only the first book, and I won't stop them, because that's a good idea. But for now... I just enjoy seeing one article only, organized and neat.


 * This is one article that I really want to keep neat the way it is now. Because the more popular it becomes and the more links and articles there are about a series, it becomes so crowded and messy and you can't keep track of all the changes, good or bad, and it just becomes a mess! Take the Warriors article - it's good, it's nice, but there are sections with like five words in them!


 * So yeah, I guess you can start making the outline of the article and writing what you want, but I would wait until more people read it. I don't like completely new and undevelopped articles, so it'd be great if the new article you're talking about would progress and bloom quickly. For that, we need more people! :D


 * Bookwormreader (talk) 17:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Smoke Mountain Cover Found!!!
For some reason, #3 was released before #2. XD http://ina.lunarmania.com/~tuibo0/sites/default/files/Seekers3%20Cover_2.jpg 76.27.108.99 (talk) 03:08, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't believe thats the cover, it doesn't look like the look of The Quest Begins cover. FireWolf787 (talk) 16:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

...It was on Tui's website. 76.27.108.99 (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC) Yeah, that pretty much pegs it as being the real cover. Plus, most book covers aren't identical, even if they are similar (which Smoke Mountain's is to The Quest Begins's). I agree that this is the cover. TakaraLioness (talk) 22:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I meant it just seems too... animated to be the real cover. The Quest Begins cover looked more realistic while this one seems so... fake. I hope they change the cover. FireWolf787 (talk) 04:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Propose a merger of all book articles to here

 * The result of the discussion was: merge. Airplaneman   ✈  22:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

I propose merging The Quest Begins (Seekers), Great Bear Lake (Seekers), and The Last Wilderness (Seekers) to this main article. I have attempted multiple times in vain to search for substantial coverage from reliable third party sources and see no potential for much expansion or content addition to the articles, even in their current state; this has led me to believe the three aforementioned articles fail WP:BK. Additionally, merging the articles to this page will add little to none new content (see WP:MERGE). Please discuss below. Airplaneman  ✈  20:28, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Support merge as nominator. Airplaneman   ✈  20:28, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. When working on a series, I've run into the same difficulty. My view now is to begin an article about a series and split into separate articles if necessary. But I think it's seldom necessary, and as you mention above, often difficult to find information. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 20:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Level of popularity is not high enough for a good number of rs to exist.  Bramble  claw  x   21:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Support while I quite enjoyed the first book and wish to read more, none of the books alone have the necessary notability to meet WP:BK. The Clique series is a decent example of how the list of novels can be formatted in a nice fashion. :-) --  AnmaFinotera (talk  ~ contribs ) 23:13, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

With your support, I have merged the content from The Last Wilderness (Seekers) to this article. I would look into doing the same with the other novel articles. Hippychick 13:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hippychickali (talk • contribs)
 * All mergers now completed. Thank you all for your input and help! Airplaneman   ✈  22:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Film Adaption
Walt Disney Pictures, Pixar, Relativity Media and Jerry Bruckheimer Films will Plan a 2013/2014 Upcoming two-part CGI/Live-Action film based on Novel Series, Jerry Bruckheimer have to direct this two films.


 * Do you have a reliable source for this?  Bramble  claw  x   21:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion to Improve
I know this is rated as a GA article, and overall it is very good. but I think the second and third paragraphs are repetitive, almost as if someone rewrote one paragraph and then neglected to remove the original. I don't want to change it, as someone has obviously put a lot of work into the article and I'd prefer for them to fix it the way they want, but I think you might want to take another look. Tlqk56 (talk) 06:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've dealt with this.  Bramble  claw  x   17:58, 21 April 2012 (UTC)