Talk:Segagaga

Verification of content
and, it's about time we discussed this on the talk page before any more revisions have been made. MrMajors in particular, you are also removing information with your reverts. So it's best you don't remove the archived links. If you have concerns, or you believe it doesn't do it as accurately as you like, it's your job to discuss it further. Especially if Namcokid47 claims the information is in the source..Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 15:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)


 * NamcoKid is not correct that the information is in the source. Futhermore this discussion is unnecessary as the reasons given here have already been given in the maintenance tags. But for reference, these are the current issues:


 * there is no mention of Okana wanting to "conceal his identity" here (https://web.archive.org/web/20080808050437/http://www.edge-online.com/magazine/the-story-sega%E2%80%99s-oddest-game-ever?page=0%2C1), only that the mask is to "promote the game". If he is trying to hide his identity then why is he signing games while wearing it? (https://web.archive.org/web/20080809044424/http://www.edge-online.com/magazine/the-story-sega%E2%80%99s-oddest-game-ever?page=0%2C4)
 * there are not "300 copyright issues regarding it's characters" or only 100 that Okana could resolve due to "time issues" - the article (https://web.archive.org/web/20080808050437/http://www.edge-online.com/magazine/the-story-sega%E2%80%99s-oddest-game-ever?page=0%2C1) says there are over 300 issues, but not all copyright issues, nor does it say why only 100 were resolved - they could be technical issues, financial issues etc.
 * the contents of the Collectors box require a citation
 * the mobile phone standalone game release date of June 6 is not the date given in the source (https://web.archive.org/web/20190929085438/https://www.famitsu.com/k_tai/news/2005/06/02/607,1117700642,39904,0,0.html)
 * the two volume soundtrack release dates require a citation
 * the "Segagaga 5 Original Soundtrack" release date of July 21 is not the date given in the source (https://web.archive.org/web/20190929085438/https://www.famitsu.com/k_tai/news/1180929_1350.html)

MrMajors (talk) 16:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Actually, you just proven how necessary this discussion really is. These are things that if you wanted to be addressed can be done better by actually discussing it and be clear.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 16:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, these are edits you could've been bold enough to clarify or adjust. Instead of adding "failed verification" tag.Blue Pumpkin <b style="color: #DAA520">Pie</b> Chat Contribs 16:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Of course I could, but in my experience NamcoKid reverts to his preferred version anyway, so the outcome is the same. MrMajors (talk) 16:41, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * All the more reason why you should've brought this up in the talkpage or been clearer about the problem from the beginning. Just adding the vague "failed verification" tag and not clarifying why is just not assisting anyone.<b style="color: #4682B4">Blue</b> <b style="color: #20B2AA">Pumpkin</b> <b style="color: #DAA520">Pie</b> Chat Contribs 16:53, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, I used the failed verification span to precisely highlight the exact text that failed verification, that's the opposite of "vague". MrMajors (talk) 17:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah but "failed verification" can be anything. it could be no source covers it, it could be that it does but it's not accurately presented in the text. It could be just as simple as date being wrong. Which you highlighted here in more detail. So yes, it is very vague.<b style="color: #4682B4">Blue</b> <b style="color: #20B2AA">Pumpkin</b> <b style="color: #DAA520">Pie</b> Chat Contribs 17:13, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Everything you said in this discussion, was not made obvious in your catch-all "failed verification" tag. there are more relevant tags to use. And even, the point is to discuss it after an editor disagrees with your assessment, not edit war.<b style="color: #4682B4">Blue</b> <b style="color: #20B2AA">Pumpkin</b> <b style="color: #DAA520">Pie</b> Chat Contribs 17:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * These "failed vertification" tags also cause needless clutter and honestly just makes it harder to read. Namcokid  47  (Contribs) 18:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Then perhaps you should take more care to avoid introducing factual errors in the first place? MrMajors (talk) 19:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Maybe this passive aggresive behavior should be brought up in ANI?M What do you think MrMajors?<b style="color: #4682B4">Blue</b> <b style="color: #20B2AA">Pumpkin</b> <b style="color: #DAA520">Pie</b> Chat Contribs 19:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)