Talk:Segregation

removal of link to Ethnic segregation
I removed the link to Ethnic segregation from the Segregation page because it redirects to the Racial segregation page. This is redundant, and so serves no purpose. If there was an actual Ethnic segregation page, I would have gladly left the link alone. As it was/is, the Ethnic segregation link was just misleading. Also, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. As the sentence in the link does not more than define it, the phrase is unnecessary as well. Thank you for trying to point out a mistake to me. In the future, please also point out why it is a mistake. Thank you! Darius4 08:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Metals
A link to metals and MSE related "Phase segregation" would be good. --Meawoppl 03:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Reorganize
A brief defintion followed by putting things first, followed by neutral practices, followed by social practices. Just less confusing for average reader. Probably should have subsections to make it even clearer, like "substances" and "practices" or something. CarolMooreDC (talk) 17:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Broad concept article may be warranted
I have styled this page according to Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages since, by all appearances, it is intended as a DAB page. That meant, for example, removing the segregation template. However, a broad concept article may be called for, discussing segregation by race, gender, etc. In that case, this page should be moved to Segregation (disambiguation) (over the redirect), since it will still be necessary to disambiguate particle segregation and the like. Cnilep (talk) 05:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)