Talk:Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Chris troutman (talk · contribs) 03:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * I'm deeply concerned that this article relies so heavily on one source. I'm not sure if that is a fatal defect.  I'm going to ask for a second opinion.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * I haven't seen much English-language writing on this subject. This covers the major aspects discussed in the literature.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * I think images from the commons could be used, even if somewhat tangential. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Heavy reliance on a single source is permitted for GA. More sourcing will be required for A-level and FA review.  While I would like to see images, there aren't any that are exactly applicable to the topic and therefore not per se necessary.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * I think images from the commons could be used, even if somewhat tangential. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Heavy reliance on a single source is permitted for GA. More sourcing will be required for A-level and FA review.  While I would like to see images, there aren't any that are exactly applicable to the topic and therefore not per se necessary.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Heavy reliance on a single source is permitted for GA. More sourcing will be required for A-level and FA review.  While I would like to see images, there aren't any that are exactly applicable to the topic and therefore not per se necessary.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 15:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)