Talk:Selarang Barracks incident/GA1

GA Review (January 08, 2008)

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * ✅ To be helpful in your comments, kindly specify where the abovementioned wiki-link is needed? According to my checks, there's one highlighted in the 1st para of the article already (unless u want redundant links?) -- Aldwinteo (talk) 08:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Checked ok.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * Checked ok.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Checked ok.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * GA Pass. Well done! --haydn_likes_carpet (talk) 00:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks mate for your support & the final touch-ups done in passing this article. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Checked ok.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * GA Pass. Well done! --haydn_likes_carpet (talk) 00:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks mate for your support & the final touch-ups done in passing this article. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks mate for your support & the final touch-ups done in passing this article. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)