Talk:Self-driving car liability

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sartuni, Alvcantu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yl1665, Ywqz228.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Some proposed changes
1. Article mixes a general description of the issues with what appears to be a solely US-centric view of the legal issues. Suggest that these are explicitly separated into different sections. 2. Terminiology - There is mention of the liability of the "programmer". I assume that this actually refers to the designer of the system, as opposed to a person who implemented someone else's design (which is what I regard as the normal meaning of the term). Suggest that precise definitions are added to clarify. Barney8000 (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Reply quotebox with inserted reviewer decisions and feedback 26-MAR-2018
Below you will see where text from your request has been quoted with individual advisory messages placed underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please see the enclosed notes for additional information about each request.      Spintendo       21:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Non deprecated source needed: users-in-charge
To lead the way of the regulation, the UK proposed to name users-in-charge the driver of a self-driving car. In such a case, the driver would not be criminally liable for some specific offenses, while the user in charge will still need to be qualified and fit to drive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.67.202.121 (talk) 18:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * To be frank, one other source do exist, so you could include your text with this better source:
 * https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/law-commissions-analysis-of-responses-to-automated-vehicle-consultation-points-to-the-way-forward/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.67.202.121 (talk) 18:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The user-in-charge and no user in charge (NUIC) also appears in fleetnews ("the blame game") in https://cdn.fleetnews.co.uk/web/1/digital-issue-categories/march-2021/FN_Mar_2021_mag/index.html#page=17 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.136.215.10 (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Current liability frameworks
"Current liability frameworks — Existing tort liability for drivers and insurers and product liability for manufacturer"

This looks like it means "now" while this "now" word should not used on wikipedia!

If liability frameworks can change with regulation changes, is this still current and existing?

Also, is this section specific to the US or a specific geographical area?

Or is this section a description for a need of regulation? 77.193.104.36 (talk) 10:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)