Talk:Self-licensing

Existence of a "license to sin" logical fallacy?
I believe that there is a logical fallacy whereby, when accused of performing an immoral action, the arguer claims that they deserve to commit the act because of their previous good deeds. Is this a thing? Should it have a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:4A2B:1801:FDAB:42DA:F2BC:A4AB (talk) 21:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Effect could not be replicated
https://plus.google.com/101046916407340625977/posts/5xXwpVQcDTg

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Self-licensing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wen-Bin_Chiou/publication/51498271_Ironic_Effects_of_Dietary_Supplementation_Illusory_Invulnerability_Created_by_Taking_Dietary_Supplements_Licenses_Health-Risk_Behaviors/links/02bfe5109d79451154000000.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 20:33, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

proposed merge
I agree with the proposed merger of these sections WotherspoonSmith (talk) 05:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Agreed and done for Moral credential effect. Klbrain (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)