Talk:Self-linking number

This material was in the linking number article, but it seems both tangential and a little too technical to be included there. Jim 02:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

The article seems to omit some important things
Doesn't a knot need to be oriented for its self-linking number to be defined?

And shouldn't the article include a few concrete examples of self-linking number?50.205.142.35 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC)