Talk:Self-organizing network

Wording update
This sentence says "using a mobile". I'm not sure what that's supposed to be...

"It verified the Automatic Neighbor Relations (ANR) feature in parts of a commercially deployed network in Sweden, using a mobile for a commercial chipset vendor. ANR automatically sets up neighbor relations based on actual radio conditions."

70.224.38.243 (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
Please do not delete this page - it refers to a new area of fully automatic, closed loop mobile network optimization that is standardized, referenceable and in early stage deployment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.163.120.224 (talk) 2009-02-21
 * You're free to remove the WP:PROD; but the article needs citations from verifiable reliable sources that deployments are imminent, not to mention the other claims made about what SONs do. --Closeapple (talk) 18:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: move to Self-organizing network Muhandes (talk) 17:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Requested move
Self-Optimizing Networks → Self-Organizing Networks — The term that is established is self-organizing networks, which in term is divided into the sub-areas self-configuration, self-optimization and self-healing. Fgunnars (talk) 08:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * As long as the text of the article has been blanked out pending a copyvio investigation it's hard to give an opinion. __meco (talk) 09:41, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I came to give an opinion and the text looked fishy. I found the copy-pasta source and had no choice but to blank. I'm not sure what the procedure is in such a case so I'll leave it to someone who knows. --Muhandes (talk) 10:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Is anyone still claiming that the most recent version of the text (before the copyright notice was last restored) infringes some copyright? I can't see any excessive similarity with the text in the source that's given.--Kotniski (talk) 14:36, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, support the move, seems to be the most common general term for the topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotniski (talk • contribs) 10:18, 18 December 2010
 * Support move to Self-organizing network unless there's evidence this is a proper name. --Pnm (talk) 03:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * SUpport. "Self-organizing network" gives 288000 hits. "Self-optimizing networks" gives 19900 hits in Google. Can we write "Self-organizing network (essentially the same thing as self-optimizing network)"? Mange01 (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.fp7-socrates.org/?q=node/5. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:53, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation needed?
This seems to be about an specific example of self-organizing network, shouldn't there be a disambiguation between the general concept and this (proposed) implementation? --TiagoTiago (talk) 10:01, 10 November 2011 (UTC)