Talk:Selma Baccar

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tbcbab. Peer reviewers: TheRealCreedBratton, Horrorfanxoxo231.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled
Talk:Selma Baccar Hi are you in Film 3301B/WGST 3812F: Analyzing Cinema, Gender, and Sexuality fall 2018? if you could get back to me soon I'd appreciate it thank you. tbcbabTbcbab (talk) 13:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Untitled
There were no noticeable grammatical errors. I believe that more notable information should be added to your introductory section and more information should be added to the early life section if possible. The sentence structure should try to flow more so that it is not so choppy. In your awards section, think about using a table for the awards. Overall, it was a well-written article.Horrorfanxoxo231 (talk) 17:44, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
Excellent contribution to this article! An important aspect you involved on Baccar’s page was how you brought in a lot of information that focused on the feminist perspective of her work and contributions which, I think, strengthens her page and your work within this class! The article maintains a neutral tone, and when I compared what was there before your contributions, the rearrangements greatly improved the layout and presentation of the information. I would only suggest minor edits to this page, mainly structural issues. Try to work some of the additions into the existing paragraphs rather than as their own lines. I noticed some repetition of information; the most obvious example would be the repetition of Baccar’s birthday under the subheading, early life and in the first line of the page. Only some repetition is existent but it is obvious where, so it is a minor edit. The first reference was not cited in a way that made it accessible to the public so I attempted to add the DOI for it. There is a heavy reliance on your first source, which does provide a large amount of important information but I wonder if you could find that information from other sources. I also had difficulties finding secondary writings on my subject but I wonder if that could help or it could be something to mention in your reflection, the challenges of finding an abundance of sources and information. All-in-all, great reshaping of this article! --TheRealCreedBratton (talk) 02:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)