Talk:Semantic integration

Merge this page with Ontology based data integration
I have a suggestion that we merge this page with 'Ontology based data integration'. hk777

Response: I would vote for keeping them separate---ontology mapping (and the associated problems of alignment and linking) are often done completely separately from data integration, and are fields of study of their own. Kevin.cohen 20:52, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Edit request on 3 October 2013
I think this is wrong according to the OWL specs: OWL for example has “sameIndividualAs” or “same-ClassAs” It should be: OWL has "SameIndividual" (owl:sameAs in RDF syntax) or EquivalentClasses (owl:equivalentClass in RDF syntax).

Papercutexit (talk) 15:57, 3 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Stfg (talk) 14:54, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 February 2015
Please change http://www.zapthink.com/report.html?id=ZapFlash-08082003 to

http://searchsoa.techtarget.com/feature/Semantic-integration-Loosely-coupling-the-meaning-of-data

because the link is dead.

72.229.156.29 (talk) 22:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done replaced with archive url. Stickee (talk) 23:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 May 2015
OWL, for example has “sameIndividualAs” or “same-ClassAs”.

Needs to be:

OWL, for example has “owl:equivalentClass”, “owl:equivalentProperty” and “owl:sameAs”.

Because "sameIndividualAs" and "same-ClassAs" are not correct syntax in OWL language.

Boanuge (talk) 01:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done replaced with the new examples, 26 May 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boanuge (talk • contribs) 01:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)