Talk:Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Rules

Thank you for a great article!

The 2nd paragraph refers: SBVR is an innovative language based on a fact-oriented approach allowing semantic interoperability between models and tools in heterogeneous environment; and semantic integrations between communities. Is SBVR a language? Is it maybe useful to rather see it as a language framework? Or as a meta-language? Is the word "innovative" appropriate? Is it neutral enough?

Underhand (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Very good point. I refined the main definition of SBVR according to the OMG specification. In doing so I avoided answering your question, as the OMG specification does not really give a direct answer. Instead I kept focusing on what are the key characteristics of SBVR. SBVR is likely a language-framework, although my quick search did not yield any reference definition of a 'language framework'. SBVR does include a meta-language, but it also allows production of concrete descriptions of vocabularies and rules.

Equilibrioception (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)