Talk:Sempra

Copyright violations
The entire text of this article was either copied verbatim or close paraphrasing from the following pages verbatim: I have removed the offending content. I restored content from revision 551181331 by at 20:02, 19 April 2013 and updated it with information on the reorganization of the subsidiaries. --Ahecht (talk) 23:33, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * http://www.sempra.com/about/
 * http://www.sempra.com/about/our-companies/SDGE.shtml
 * http://www.semprainternational.com/
 * http://www.sempra.com/about/our-companies/southern-california-gas-co.shtml
 * http://www.sempra.com/about/our-companies/semprausgp.shtml

NPOV concerns
Looks like a single-purpose account is attempting to whitewash sourced material and insert a bland corporate propaganda piece in place of this article. While that obviously cannot stand, I think the current "History" section is also written in an inappropriate tone. Wikipedia should be, in general, presenting sourced facts, not leaping to conclusions. Someone with more knowledge than I on this subject should take a look at how this can be approached. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Seems to be two separate single-purpose accounts, one inserting bland corporate-speak and another that wrote the POV abomination about Santa Teresa II that I just deleted. That project is still in the feasilibity study phase -- only Santa Teresa I has been built -- and can be mentioned without WP:UNDUE problems as long as it is in the context of Sempra International's many other current and proposed projects. As it was, it was almost the whole article. Antandrus (talk) 04:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)