Talk:Sengkang MRT/LRT station/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 13:56, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments

 * "free regular and bridging bus services", "The repair works were completed by 11:49am" - minor paraphrasing required.
 * "5:45 am on Sundays" - not required, too much detail.
 * Needs further trimming. Day specific timings not required, just mention the average or the weekday time.
 * Use 24 hour format and mention the timezone.
 * Rather not, since the context is in Singapore anyway--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * $166.4 million, which country's dollar?
 * Singapore dollar. Added link--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * "Passenger Service Centre" - capitalised case not required.
 * Expand the lead a little bit.
 * The station opened ... 20 June that year - if possible, move to another para. (MOS:PARA)
 * Expanded the para to include the fact it starts to serve the West loop in 2005.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Some citations are not properly formatted. Like [15]. Add author's name etc. Also, remove these "LTA | News room" from the citations.
 * . Not all citations have authors. Will fix the book links as well.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ fixed citations--ZKang123 (talk) 04:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Need more details about the "Art-in-Transit Programme". Provide wikilink or a note.
 * ✅ Added note--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Replace "Media related to Sengkang MRT/LRT Station at Wikimedia Commons" with.
 * Will prefer the inline, as that has already been introduced by --ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * "Sengkang NEL MRT platforms" I would suggest changing the caption to "MRT platforms of the station".
 * Add other East loop stations on the SKLRT opened along with this in the body also.
 * ✅ added footnote--ZKang123 (talk) 04:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Doesn't feel relevant; the article Sengkang LRT line will provide such information.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * "The LRT station opened on 18 January 2003 along with the other East loop stations on the SKLRT" - since this is mentioned in the lead, it should be in the body too.  ❯❯❯  S A H A  
 * The Bus Interchanges in lead - also add them to the body.
 * ✅ Added location section.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Aljunied, Bishan, Khatib, Kranji and Yew Tee - wikilink them.
 * "The lifts were ... by end 2013." - I don't think year of installation is significant.
 * The last para of Public artwork section has only 1 citation. I would suggest adding more.
 * There's only one book thus far detailing the thought process behind it. I'm not sure if there are, but I will check.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * What is Kampung?
 * Wiki-linked. Malay name for villages.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 4 platforms, 4 tracks, 2 island platforms - Add this in the body with source.
 * There isn't really an official source on this, sadly.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You can use image citations as nothing else is available.  ❯❯❯  S A H A  
 * Make a separate heading for the incident, above notes and refs.
 * What do you mean? May need further clarification.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Move the "incidents" section from "History" to a new section at the end (below "Station details").
 * Not required.  ❯❯❯  S A H A  
 * wikilink "interchange station" in the first line.
 * add that the station is elevated, in the body.
 * The station has four levels, and 3 platform levels. This might create confusion. Add what the other level is.
 * Disabled access citation needed.
 * "The station is connected to compass heights and others" - this is mentioned twice (in 'location' and 'design'). Remove one of them.
 * "includes improved barrier-free access to the station, new dual-speed escalators leading to the platforms, and an additional lift for the MRT, LRT and mezzanine levels of Sengkang station." - While spot checking, found this part is same as the citation no. [14].
 * No need to mention "ambitious programme", as almost all govt. (even in my country) say the programmes ambitious. Instead you can mention the programme name.
 * wikilink "interchange station" in the first line.
 * add that the station is elevated, in the body.
 * The station has four levels, and 3 platform levels. This might create confusion. Add what the other level is.
 * Disabled access citation needed.
 * "The station is connected to compass heights and others" - this is mentioned twice (in 'location' and 'design'). Remove one of them.
 * "includes improved barrier-free access to the station, new dual-speed escalators leading to the platforms, and an additional lift for the MRT, LRT and mezzanine levels of Sengkang station." - While spot checking, found this part is same as the citation no. [14].
 * No need to mention "ambitious programme", as almost all govt. (even in my country) say the programmes ambitious. Instead you can mention the programme name.
 * "includes improved barrier-free access to the station, new dual-speed escalators leading to the platforms, and an additional lift for the MRT, LRT and mezzanine levels of Sengkang station." - While spot checking, found this part is same as the citation no. [14].
 * No need to mention "ambitious programme", as almost all govt. (even in my country) say the programmes ambitious. Instead you can mention the programme name.

 ❯❯❯  S A H A   11:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Further comments by Epicgenius

 * is within walking distance to the Compassvale Bus Interchange. - should probably be "within walking distance of"
 * developed under an ambitious programme by the Government - Either the Singapore government could be linked here, or "Government" should be lowercase.
 * The station begun to serve the West loop - "The station began..." or "The station had begun...". In this case, "began" is better.
 * In 2018, it was announced that the station will be further upgraded which includes improved barrier-free access to the station, new dual-speed escalators leading to the platforms, and an additional lift for the MRT, LRT and mezzanine levels of Sengkang station as well as expanding the current LRT train platform to create a more spacious area for commuters by 2022. - I'd split this into 2 sentences, after "the MRT, LRT and mezzanine levels of Sengkang station".
 * The station is located in Sengkang New Town[20], located along Sengkang Square.[1] - put punctuation before references, and I would remove both instances of "located".
 * The MRT/LRT station was the first such station on the MRT network to have all three modes of transport seamlessly connected. - "Seamlessly connected" sounds strange. I would suggest something like "The MRT/LRT station was the first intermodal station on the MRT network for all three modes of transport". epicgenius (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * In 2018, it was announced that the station will be further upgraded which includes improved barrier-free access to the station, new dual-speed escalators leading to the platforms, and an additional lift for the MRT, LRT and mezzanine levels of Sengkang station as well as expanding the current LRT train platform to create a more spacious area for commuters by 2022. - I'd split this into 2 sentences, after "the MRT, LRT and mezzanine levels of Sengkang station".
 * The station is located in Sengkang New Town[20], located along Sengkang Square.[1] - put punctuation before references, and I would remove both instances of "located".
 * The MRT/LRT station was the first such station on the MRT network to have all three modes of transport seamlessly connected. - "Seamlessly connected" sounds strange. I would suggest something like "The MRT/LRT station was the first intermodal station on the MRT network for all three modes of transport". epicgenius (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The MRT/LRT station was the first such station on the MRT network to have all three modes of transport seamlessly connected. - "Seamlessly connected" sounds strange. I would suggest something like "The MRT/LRT station was the first intermodal station on the MRT network for all three modes of transport". epicgenius (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The MRT/LRT station was the first such station on the MRT network to have all three modes of transport seamlessly connected. - "Seamlessly connected" sounds strange. I would suggest something like "The MRT/LRT station was the first intermodal station on the MRT network for all three modes of transport". epicgenius (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Further comment by Dave
Someone pinged me inregards to Commons being inline - Generally speaking I prefer inline when there's barely any external links - A box template is useful over inline when there's a lot of links as the reader may miss it with there being loads of links whereas that wouldn't be the case with 1 or 2 links, Personally I see no reason why this should be changed and I'm rather miffed as to why a Commons link is part of a GA criteria....– Davey 2010 Talk 21:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)