Talk:Sensient Technologies

Fair use rationale for Image:Sensient logo.gif
Image:Sensient logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here. Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories, but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns, please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 06:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Controversy section
I have found enough information on news websites, etc to, i believe, warrant a controversy section. I have started this off but will make a better effort on it when I have the time. If anyone else would like to research and expand on this at anypoint that would also be cool. I've added 2 references to the section already but there's a lot more information out there on this. Danno81 (talk) 10:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh they are so going to sue you ;) Wjousts (talk) 18:53, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh no! I think you're right... *runs and hides* Danno81 (talk) 13:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)