Talk:Sensitive periods/Archive 1

Copied
This page has been copied from the external link. I assume this means it's infringing copyright...

I have permission from the author to do so, it's not infringing copyright. Thunderbolt16 22:33, Mar 23, 2004 (UTC)

I made some major major changes to this article, giving a different view on the sensitive periods (more from a neurological/developmental angle) and adding some references to Dr. Montessori's published materials.MatthewDBA

Lack of context
This article seems to set out a particular conception of childhood. It lacks context on other views and a criticial evaluation of these opinions. Sumahoy 19:59, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Montessori split
This article is about a particular understanding of development (Montessori) with which many would disagree and lacks reference to the research in neurodevelopment and cognitive development upon sensitive periods--research that is not mentioned here. This content is more appropriate in a separate article and this might allow such omitted research to get a space.--LittleHow (talk) 11:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * If all of this article is focused on Montessori, then why split it in two? There could be a redirect from the other title you suggested. This page can have sections that emphasise differences if there are few. I'd rather have a longer page with a bit of exception, than two short pages that you must find and read in full. Rixs (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I have created a redirect to this article. Split not appropriate.  SilkTork  *YES! 22:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)