Talk:Sensory integration therapy

References needed
The body of this article has zero references, and I expect that it contains many claims that on balance are not supported by reliable sources. I have tagged it; if we can't find good sources for it perhaps we should just remove the body and turn the article into a stub. The lead is well-cited, so it can stay. Eubulides (talk) 15:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I checked the references from the introduction, and it seems the writer is writing with bias. For example, for the discussion on weighted vest, it was written as if there definitely was no benefit. There were no benefits found. So, there is no reason weighted vests should, at this point, be used clinically without better information. Immediately after that statement in the cited article, it was then stated that there could be benefits, but those were unknown - that methodology of the studies should be improved.

I am not an active editor for Wikipedia, but I was researching for my son. I hope this will be updated with better references and more objectivity. User: Anonymous 21:33, 25 May, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.182.46.172 (talk) 01:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

This article has zero references past the introduction and it violates Wikipedia:NPOV anywhere you look except the introduction. The article could be remedied by sourcing all this non-sourced content with reliable sources and making the language of the article more NPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123chess456 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Problems with POV
This article still have problems with NPOV, as the theme is sensory integration therapy, but derails into a extensive teory about A. Jean Ayres's research when a concise section would be enough. --Luk3 (talk) 16:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)