Talk:Senussi campaign

Question
Just wondering whether the tile 'Uprising' is correct? Who were they rising against? Wouldn't 'The Senussi Campaign' be better? Huttoldboys (talk) 02:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Just added some detail about the campaign and the page could probably do with a good clean up, as a result. I would be happy to discuss.--RoslynSKP (talk) 06:46, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

ce
Tidied some overlaps and duplication, swapped to sfns and added citations where needed and changed Uprising to Campaign. Keith-264 (talk) 19:31, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Found some detail in Strachan and Jones, that's about it.Keith-264 (talk) 20:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think that's the right (or best) way to cite Strachan. It's a projected three-volume work called The First World War, of which volume one is To Arms. It's not as if OUP is doing a series on the First World War to which this is a contribution. Also, I'm planning to add stuff from Meynier later. That's why I had him in the references, not the further reading. Srnec (talk) 11:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I prefer my version of the Strachan reference but I'll defer to you. I'd hoped you were going to add material, since my sources are too Anglocentric for more than a B class I fear. If you include the harv details before you cite passages, there's lots of red warnings generated in the references section if you have User:Keith-264/common.js installed. The first script shows up harv errors. Which ones would you like me to put back?Keith-264 (talk) 12:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll get it later, since I'm still trying to piece together a bibliography for the Italian section. Srnec (talk) 15:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

@ Nihlus1, Put your source in the references section but not too sure about the details, are they OK? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please stop vandalising the page. If you want citations, scroll down, they are all there. Keith-264 (talk) 19:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Additions and changes
i would like to add france as a belligerent and change it to a stalemate instead of a british italian victory but i want to confirm it's ok before making these changes Sanad real (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You must not change thin[g]s according to what you think, we can only describe what is in Reliable sources. The ones in the biblio describe a British and Italian victory. Regards. Keith-264 (talk) 15:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * is it ok to add france though? Sanad real (talk) 21:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Do you have any reliable sources proving that France was a belligerent? QuicoleJR (talk) 21:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * i have a video even though there may be some inaccuracies it shows that french tunisia was at least partially involved Sanad real (talk) 00:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * YouTube is not a reliable source. QuicoleJR (talk) 01:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Not sure a video counts as a reliable source Reliable sources Keith-264 (talk) 00:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * ok then Sanad real (talk) 03:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)