Talk:September Morn/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 18:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

: The article is very well written, well-structured, and organized. I'm in fact deeply impressed with its layout. If I had to guess... (talk) 14:23, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article hosts a very healthy bibliography of reliable third-party sources. After taking a few minutes to review the lacing of citations, I am confident that they are well-applied, and leaving nothing to chance where verifiability is concerned. If I had to guess... (talk) 14:36, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article definitely seems to cover all relevant aspects of the topic for which information of encyclopedic value is available. None of the information incorporated appears trivial or excessive. If I had to guess... (talk) 14:26, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. For such a controversial topic, this article nonetheless efficiently handles the job of discussing the subject without bias. If I had to guess... (talk) 14:24, 9 November 2014 (UTC) . The article has not been the subject of any edit warring at least since late September, according to the most recent revisions in its history. &#34;We could read for-EVER&#59; reading round the wiki!&#34; (talk) 18:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC) : The article is very well illustrated, and all images look to be validly licensed. They are from Wikimedia Commons, so I'm pretty sure fair use rules are being obeyed here as well. &#34;We could read for-EVER&#59; reading round the wiki!&#34; (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)


 * Thanks, I'll be waiting. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Wilhelmina Will, any news? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

After reading the article over and comparing its content to the criteria for GAs, I am certain the criteria is met, and am therefore passing the article. If I had to guess... (talk) 14:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, WW. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)