Talk:Serbia Broadband

Criticism section - neutrality disputed
Based on, and according to the WP:Neutral point of view, WP:NPOV dispute, I find the neutrality of the article's section "Criticism" disputed. Even though its name looks fairly neutral, in my opinion, the whole content of it looks one-sided, without sorting out different opinions which take part in it. Even some sources linking to these statements are coming from a Blog articles, which is kind of problematic - WP:Blogs as sources, as its content may be subjective and doesn't perceive many different views on the current situation.-- AirWolf  talk  05:57, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Neutrality dispute
I believe the section on Criticism to be factual in relation to the loss of service suffered by SBB customers on 28th March 2015. The provider offered little guidance to subscribers for a considerable time after the outage. An apology was issued on the company's Twitter and Facebook accounts. Subscribers continued to suffered service outages for a number of days following the incident.

The section should provide further evidence of alleged poor customer service by the company to support the author's opinion.

Royphish (talk) 15:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


 * The criticism in question may be factual, but should also be based on reliable sources in order to establish relevance. However, the central claim (outage on 29 March 2015) is sourced to a forum. I don't think that's sufficient. I tend to agree with what AirWolf has said above.
 * I've changed the order so that the article does not begin with a "Criticism" section right away. GregorB (talk) 01:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)