Talk:Serious Sam 2/GA1

GA Reassessment

 * Due to a lack of activity, the article has been delisted. Renominations at any time are welcome. -15:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

It's been a good 26 months or so since I reviewed this and passed it as a GA... however as part of WikiProject Good Articles project quality task force I am re-reviewing the article, and mapped to the current good article criteria this article is lacking in several respects. Outlined below: If you need any assistance with the above, I would be happy to lend whatever spare time I have to helping. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 02:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Prose: choppy in places, but that's nothing a good copyediting pass wouldn't fix.
 * Coverage: More info for reception is needed and the reviews that exist could stand to be expanded. I will see if there are print magazine/newspaper refs that could be used to expand this.
 * Images: need better Fair use rationales per WP:NFCC. I removed the images that obviously wouldn't fly already.
 * References look fine in terms of reliability, but the citation templates should be entirely filled out.
 * The lead needs to be reworked; we don't need publication scores in the lead unless it's exceptionally notable, and it should summarize the entire article.
 * Gameplay could stand some additional referencing and maybe some trimming (there might be some original research and comparisons lurking in there that should be taken care of.