Talk:Serostatus

Was redirect, now own article
can you say why you felt this concept should be separate from seroconversion? It seems to me that there are two closely related concepts here which are almost the same, and not much content to differentiate the articles. Which sources are used in either of these articles do you think would be inappropriate for using in discussing the other concept? Previously, serostatus was a redirect to seroconversion, but you wanted to WP:FORK the articles. Why?  Blue Rasberry  (talk)  00:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The increasing recognition of seronegative autoimmune diseases, along with improving technology that continues to identify new antibodies, has made serostatus a unique area of research. Seroconversion describes the process of getting a disease, not the state of being seronegative or seropositive. This article is about those states, not that process. All of this article's references are uniquely about serostatus and not seroconversion.Nocowardsoulismine (talk) 01:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)