Talk:Service governance

Improvement by including more perspectives
It is a good point about improving the perspectives. I'd be interested in any specific recommendations as to which perspectives should be included.

Service Governance works in countries where there is a move towards modern comply-and-explain governance (as in the ISO-309 standard), it is less relevant in countries where they still have the old-fashioned tick-box 'governance' - stuff like Sarbaines-Oxley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fustbariclation (talk • contribs) 18:34, 17 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Right now the main perspective is that of recommended good corporate governance in common law jurisdictions based on South African and British research into best practises. Some comparison to other best practises and how the concept has been applied globally would be of use. Of additional consideration would be what alternative best practises have been put forward, both historically and from different sources of modern corporate governance theory. Perhaps some additional attention to how it is used in IT environments. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The ISO standard for Governance, ISO 37000 has entered its final stage before publication, and it supports the values and principles of Service Governance Fustbariclation (talk) 10:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC)