Talk:Service number

Random alphabetic number? That doesn't make sense :) --99.250.177.248 (talk) 21:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Similarly, 'meaningless checksum' in the Royal Navy service number doesn't make sense - either it's meaningless or it's a checksum :) --Lordandmaker (talk) 00:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

I think we need some more countries on the list, we need expansion. of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.175.17.50 (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Are they back to using "service numbers" as of 2015?
This article needs to be updated, since it basically stops the narrative as of 2011 (saying that something "will happen" in 2015).

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Service number. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150714085750/http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=63409 to http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=63409

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)