Talk:Session-based testing

Mission vs. Charter
The recent edit from User:Karlo.smid seems to embed a debate about the content of the article within the article itself. ("Mission should not be separated from Charter. Charters are used to describe missions. There is no mission chapter in session report. This is clearly described in Testing in Sessions chapter: [sic]") Are there any useful improvements that this edit suggests, or should it be reverted entirely? Faught (talk) 17:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Reverted. I have not seen "mission" used by practitioners. It may be a new term, but until it becomes more widely used, it should be removed. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The Mission section precedes this recent edit, and the mission is mentioned in the given reference. Are you suggesting a bigger change? Faught (talk) 18:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * No. I just reverted per this discussion. Bach's SBTM doesn't really talk about a mission document, and that's what the wording made it seem like.
 * If that's not what you were aiming for, we can revert. Perhaps we should change the ref to the SBTM pdf on Bach's site as the StickyMinds ref is far too vague (and I suspect it was me who added it). Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I cleaned up the references and external links. If you want to find additional citations, see the references in the Lyndsay article. Faught (talk) 19:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)