Talk:Set of all sets

rewritten
The previous version of this article contained misinformation. I have rewritten it.

Randall Holmes 15:37, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Could the content of this article possibly be stated in layman's terms as well, or would that create redundancy? Sorry, never mind, I just read the Russell's paradox article and that made it more clear Evan Donovan 00:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)