Talk:Seth Gecko

Move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. The undiscussed merge was reversed. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Seth Gecko → Seth and Richie Gecko – More approiate article title. Relisted. BDD (talk) 21:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC) 71.255.165.54 (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose the nominator merged to this article just before s/he nominated it for renaming. I suggest the two articles be demerged. If Richie Gecko is not notable enough for an article, then he should be redirected to the list article List of From Dusk till Dawn characters. There is no reason for him to be merged to this article. -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 04:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose I concur that Richie Gecko should not have been merged into this article, and would be better redirecting to List of From Dusk till Dawn characters. Fortdj33 (talk) 00:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

move again

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. The undiscussed merge was reverted again. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:47, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Seth Gecko → Seth and Richie Gecko – more appropriate title, richie is not notable enough to have his own artcle he has made less appearances than seth and always appears with seth when in media  the article has been rewritten to regard the two brothers as a group anyway. arent we trying to get rid of plot dump? 71.255.161.192 (talk) 22:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

why is earl and edgar mcgraw one shared article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.161.192 (talk) 22:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * What has changed sine the last time when no one accepted this proposal?--69.157.253.74 (talk) 02:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It could also be the case that the article than needs to be changed is Earl and Edgar McGraw.--69.157.253.74 (talk) 22:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong oppose The article should be reverted to being a Seth article. If you think they are not notable, merge them to the list article List of From Dusk till Dawn characters. If only Seth is notable, there's no reason for this article to be renamed. There's no reason for a merge in any case. The merger is undiscussed, and was rejected in the last move request, so should be reverted. Further, the nominator's proposal failed two months ago, so s/he should go on and improve the list article instead of doing to same rejected thing again. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:14, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose. This article should not be about both characters. I agree that if there is not enough info about Richie Gecko to warrant a separate article, it should be redirected to List of From Dusk till Dawn characters, but it should not have been merged here. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.