Talk:Sex, Love & Secrets/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 12:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * Should you clarify in the infobox that the official website is an archived version?
 * Clarified. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "from September 27, 2005 and October 18, 2005" - should this be "from September 27, 2005 to October 18, 2005"?
 * Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Do you think it's important to list all the executive producers in the lead considering none of them are notable enough to have a Wikipedia article?
 * Good point. Removed. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd introduce John Kenneth Muir as a "critic"
 * Added. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "while the official website references" - this seems an odd choice of word, why not just say 'states' instead of 'references'
 * Good point. Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * 'and lines include: "Be it Santa Claus, Twinkies, infidelity or murder, all humans keep secrets."' - I'm not sure if this adds anything to the article. It's a pretty silly thing to say; is that what you're trying to convey to the reader? That the narration wasn't very serious? Is this narration quote typical?
 * I think that it is important to include a portion from the v/o since the entire second paragraph is about this, and (unfortunately) this is the only example that I could find from a credible source. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "while using "clinical terms"" - any chance we can get an example?
 * Unfortunately, I could not find any examples about this. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A thought to be dead boyfriend coming back into her life seems like a pretty big deal. Makes me want to know more about the circumstances. I understand it might be difficult to expand on this with brevity though
 * Unfortunately, I could not find further information about this. I had trouble finding information about show's storylines beyond the pilot. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "Preview videos were released on the official website for Sex, Love & Secrets" - I'd just say 'Preview videos were released on the shows official website'
 * Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Looks really good overall. Placing on hold until issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 12:47, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. I believe that I have addressed everything. I hope that you are having a wonderful weekend so far. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Happy for this to pass now. Freikorp (talk) 22:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)