Talk:Sexual Harassment (The Office)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Looking good. Only a few suggestions:
 * Unbold quotes around episode title.
 * Done -- Mr.crabby    (Talk)   14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * he realizes that he's not in trouble, that the lawyer's job is to protect him -- avoid contractions and use "he is"; also maybe there should be an "and" after the comma?
 * Done -- Mr.crabby    (Talk)   14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * asks in whispers (shushed by an embarrassed Pam) which one is Jim -- which what is Jim?
 * Done -- Mr.crabby    (Talk)   14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Michael stops Todd Packer when he tries to share another inappropriate joke -- reads kind of oddly to have Todd's surname when none of the other characters have a surname upon second mention.
 * In Production he's also referred to as just Packer. Whichever you think is best, just refer to his as "Todd" or "Packer" after his first mention.
 * Done -- Mr.crabby    (Talk)   14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Having both worked in office environments prior to filming The Office -- italicise the show title; and do we need to link office?
 * Corvette currently links to a type of warship -- perhaps you mean Chevrolet Corvette? :)
 * Done -- Mr.crabby    (Talk)   14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * You can link Television Without Pity.
 * Done -- Mr.crabby    (Talk)   14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Again (I think I addressed this in a previous Office review), per WP:MOSTV polls to the general public are considered unreliable and shouldn't be included, i.e. the OfficeTally.com poll.
 * Removed -- Mr.crabby    (Talk)   14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Image:TheOffice(US)2-02.jpg isn't low resolution and should be scaled down; also, is there a better image we could use? The situation with Jim isn't mentioned in the plot so obviously wasn't a really pivotal part of the episode.
 * How about now? -- Mr.crabby    (Talk)   14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

That's about it :) Good luck with the changes, the article's on hold for a week. — 97198   talk  07:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Awesome. Only one little thing outstanding (he iss not in trouble) but that's easily fixed and I'm happy to promote to GA status in the meantime. — 97198   talk  06:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)