Talk:Sexuality of Adolf Hitler/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 16:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this article later today. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 16:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Is it well-written? ✅
 * Is it verifiable with no original research? ✅
 * Is it broad in its coverage? ✅
 * Is it neutral? ✅
 * Is it stable? ✅
 * Is it illustrated? ✅
 * Diannaa, the overall article looks fine and I see no common problems with it. With that being said, I'm having a really hard time understanding why Langer's report is giving so much weight in this article. After all, didn't Kershaw 2008 say that the "Hitler-was-sexsually-turned-on-by-having-women-pee-and-defect-on-his-face" content in Langer's report ought to be regarded as nonsense? Also, Langer's report itself states that the report is based on enumerable sources, none of which were first hand or 100% reliable. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 23:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * These reports need to be covered because that's where a lot of the rumors got started. I have trimmed for length -- Diannaa (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Awesome job, as always, I've passed the article. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 00:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)