Talk:Sexxx Dreams/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: FrB.TG (talk · contribs) 22:12, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

I should be able to comment in a few days. Please keep one thing in mind that this is my first review and I might make mistakes. Before full review, on a quick-glance, I can see that there are many issues with references, which I'm going to list soon. -- Frankie  talk 22:12, 21 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * "also censored as" => "censored as".
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Alphabetize the names of writers in the infobox. I would understand that Gaga, being the singer of the song, should come first, but that's not the case in producer neither should be in writer.
 * I believe this is the order in which the writers/producers are credited in the album's liner notes. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 15:53, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think it is best to keep them as they appear in the liner notes. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Images
 * Images need personality rights warnings at the Commons.
 * I don't know what this means... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It means this. Per 6a. criterion. -- Frankie  talk 16:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:47, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * DJ Snake.jpg needs an alt text. Caption – William Grigahcine is more popularly known by the name of DJ Snake.
 * I don't think William Grigahcine is more popularly known by the name of DJ Snake. is acceptable alt text. That would be more suited for a caption. "DJ Snake" or even "refer to caption" would suffice as alt text. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 15:53, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I, too, was suggesting it for caption, not for alt text, but I guess it is written in a confusing way. -- Frankie  talk 16:07, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Janet jackson.png – ALT needed.
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Lady Gaga at Roseland Ballroom 7.jpg – ditto.
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * References
 * Author needed for ref 2.
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * There might be substitutes available for Metro (British newspaper).
 * I don't see a need for a substitute. (?) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Daily Mirror is not a reliable source.
 * But can a paper like this just publish a direct quote from the artist if it is not true? The quote was also published by ContactMusic.com, The Arizona Republic, etc. I realize the source may not be preferred, but it is only being used to cite a direct quotation. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Is NewNowNext reliable?
 * The NewNowNext Awards are from the TV network Logo, which is owned by Viacom (Nickelodeon, MTV, etc.). It's reliable. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 15:53, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * What makes RyanSeacrest.com a high quality source?
 * Seacrest is a well-known entertainment news anchor; I don't see why his website would not be considered reliable. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 15:53, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Agreed. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The Atlantic needs to be linked in ref. 11.
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Digital Spy shouldn't be in italics in ref 12.
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Do you think it's safe to use a reference from Idolator?
 * Sure, why not? It is published by SpinMedia, which also published Spin and Vibe. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * MTV News linked twice in ref 5 and 15.
 * Done. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I am not sure if The Huffington Post is eligible for GA, I was asked in an FLC to remove it.
 * The Huffington Post is generally considered a reliable source. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 15:53, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No it isn't  . --  Frankie  talk 15:59, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * That first site you provided itself does not look reliable. You may wish to look at this thread from RSN. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 16:33, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I use HuffPost articles all the time without problem. Is there a specific Wikipedia policy/guideline which says HuffPost cannot be used? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This may not make a difference, but keep in mind this source is just used to describe a live performance and not to verify a controversial fact. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Hmm, surely live performance isn't something they would lie about, so I think it's safe to keep that source. -- Frankie  talk 18:54, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The link for ref 27 is broken.
 * Hmm, I am not sure what to do about this. It worked at some point. Marked with the "dead link" template until I can think of another solution. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:41, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * You can use this. -- Frankie  talk 16:45, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Wonderful, thank you! Done --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * Summary


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I hereby put it on hold for 7 days. I wouldn't mind giving more time if needed. -- Frankie  talk 15:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I've left some outside comments in response to your suggestions. I have not worked extensively on this article and am not the nominator. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 15:53, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I hereby put it on hold for 7 days. I wouldn't mind giving more time if needed. -- Frankie  talk 15:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I've left some outside comments in response to your suggestions. I have not worked extensively on this article and am not the nominator. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 15:53, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I hereby put it on hold for 7 days. I wouldn't mind giving more time if needed. -- Frankie  talk 15:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I've left some outside comments in response to your suggestions. I have not worked extensively on this article and am not the nominator. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 15:53, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, both, for reviewing the article and participating in this nomination. Much appreciated, and I look forward to resolving all issues. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Everything seems to be done, but whenever I have used Huffpost, it has been objected by someone. I have opened a discussion here and once this query is resolved I should have no problem passing this. -- Frankie  talk 16:51, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Thanks again for your time and assistance. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:54, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Update: I also added links to the fairly recently-created article for DJ White Shadow. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:11, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * All resolved. I shall finish the process tomorrow if it's okay . -- Frankie  talk 19:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I am passing this article, if anyone is not satisfied with the review, they can take it to WP:GAR. Cheers. -- Frankie  talk 20:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)