Talk:Seyfarth Shaw

Untitled
When you look at the List of 100 largest law firms globally, this firm is the only one without links or a description. Why not have a stub and a link to the website? It's more useful than having nothing. You just deleted it too quickly for me to put in any details. NeilKT (talk) 16:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree, being in the top 100 implies, but does not guarantee, notability. I have removed the speedy tag and encourage you to expand it.  This does mean that the article cannot have further debate about it appropriateness on Wikipedia through an article for deletion debate.  Jon513 (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Could you confirm the citation has been done properly? Not keen to add more content if the citations become too onerous.NeilKT (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The article is currently formated fine but it needs to be expanded. You should read Footnotes to learn how to make footnotes on wikipedia.  It is more important to do you best then to worry that you got everything right.  Someone can always come along after you and correct any mistakes you make.  Also these results at google news for "Seyfarth Shaw" might be helpful in expanding the article.  Jon513 (talk) 19:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)