Talk:Sfogliatella

Sfogliatelle
Actually "foglia" means leaves/layers. An "s" at the beginning of an Italian word negates it. Therefore sfogliatelle means without layers. A Napoleon is layered. Sfogliatelle is(are) dense.

Citron or Citron Succade?
Please clearify! if the filling is made of fresh citron or citron Succade. Also since it is an Italian food, if the variety used for this purpose is the Diamante citron variety? CitricAsset (talk) 19:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Sfogliatelle or Sfogliatella
does anyone have sources on which spelling is preferred? Mvemkr (talk) 06:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Sfogliatella is singular, Sfogliatelle is plural. Feminine nouns ending in a become e in the plural. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genedelisa (talk • contribs) 16:08, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Sopranos characters' pronunciations
I just want to point out, spuiatell is not a Sicilian pronunciation. Sicilians do not pronounce LL (it becomes DD). And the Sopranos were mostly Neapolitan (Southern Italian) and not Sicilian. Only a few of the characters (Phil Leotardo, Carmela's mother) were Sicilian. Most of the Italian-American slang and other expressions used in Sopranos are based on Neapolitan and not Sicilian. Therefore, I'm going to remove the alleged Sicilian pronunciation of Pauly Walnuts. He wasn't even Sicilian on the show, he's Neapolitan-American like most of the rest of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Siciliano69 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Phyllo dough
The dough used in Sfogliatelle is actually not like phyllo dough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.150.20 (talk) 18:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: move the page, per the discussion below and WP:PLURAL. Dekimasu よ! 01:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Sfogliatelle → Sfogliatella – There is no reason why we should use the plural form, which also in the literature and in the article is recognised as such. If this were an americanism, then it should be used and declined using the singular verb (e.g. "Sfogliatelle is a cake"), but this is not the case, so it is implicit that the singular form sfogliatella is known also in english. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 13:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC) Alex2006 (talk) 09:10, 25 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose. This ngram shows it is referred to as sfogliatelle considerably more often than sfogliatella, which isn't unusual as far as English-language adoption of words for Italian foods goes (biscotti instead of biscotto, cannoli instead of cannolo). Egsan Bacon (talk) 15:37, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You did not get my point: did you read what I wrote above? I`ll give you a hint: look here. Alex2006 (talk) 17:00, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did read it. And then I disagreed with it. That's why I !voted in a way that indicated that I disagreed with it. (I'm sure you're already aware that not agreeing with a point is not the same as "not getting it".) In my comment, I provided a couple of examples, biscotti and cannoli. Had you gone to those pages, you would have seen that they begin "Biscotti... are" and "Cannoli are".  Here are some more: "Ravioli... are", "Tortellini are", "Fusilli are", "Manicotti are", "Panzarotti or panzerotti are", "Pizzelle... are", "Baicoli... are", "Pevarini... are". Your assertions about what "should" be done if it's an "Americanism" (and you might want to look at British English usage) are not correct and I do not agree with them, and the articles don't agree with them either.  Does the fact that the cannoli article begins "Cannoli are" rather than "Cannoli is" or "A cannoli is" mean that "it is implicit that the singular form cannolo is known also in English"? Because it isn't.
 * I'm also rather confused about how your "hint" of an Italian-language ngram is relevant. Your initial point was about the word's usage in English, so why are you indicating appearances in Italian language sources? More to the point, considering that this is an article written in English on the English-language Wikipedia, why even bring it up? Egsan Bacon (talk) 20:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I try to explain it again, since what I wrote apparently is not clear. The ngrams have sense only if the frequency of plural/singular is much higher than the other (as in "cannoli"). In those case is clear, what is used is prevalently one form. In the cases where the frequencies are comparable, you cannot distinguish whether the name is declined or not. With my hint I wanted to say that also in Italian the frequency of the plural is higher than that of the singular, but this is not a reason to use only the plural in the definition. In our specific case, from the ngram only you cannot understand whether there are two "versions" (singular and plural) of the name, or whether the name is declined inside the documents (or, of course, a combination of both). The reason why I asked to rename the article is not to "wash in Arno" (as we say in Italy :-)) the "sfogliatelle", but it comes from the observation that I found in several English texts the name declined (exactly as in Italian texts we decline foreign names). I hope that now my thought is little bit clear. :-) Alex2006 (talk) 16:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Support. Ignoring the WP:DRAMA, it's clear that the sfogliatella is a discrete, individual food item, like any other pastry, of which one might buy/make and eat just one, which is not the case with spaghetti, etc. No one orders a single, lone piece of fusilli, and the article on that doesn't even mention the singular. It's not even the case with ravioli and tortellini, except when someone offers a gimmicky giant version the size of a plate.  Those sorts of article belong as plural-form names, as their subjects are mass nouns, not (or not primarily) count nouns.  Whether sfogliatelle are somewhat more often marketed more than one at a time, increasing (barely) the incidence of the plural over the singular is essentially irrelevant, as in the directly comparable case of Donut and Cookie.   See also Antipasto, Bruchetta, Crostino, Cotoletta, etc.  Just because it's Italian and we eat it doesn't mean it should have a plural-titled article, even when Americans are more likely to use the plural form (as is obviously the case with antipasti, and probably with crostini). Alessandro57/Alex2006 is correct, despite this RM not being the clearest nomination and rationale, that ngrams only tell us something useful when the difference between the compared values is  not just slightly different.  If its only slight, even statistical error can account for it. So could any number of other factors, e.g. maybe the plural is more popular in and around New York City, which has a huge Italian-American population almost entirely non-FLuent in Italian, and NYC also happens to be the center of the English-language book publishing world.  Who knows?  Ngrams are a tool to apply when they're useful, not when they seem to but do not really do something useful. We default to using singular for a reason, and nothing about this case contraindicates us doing so here.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.