Talk:Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (soundtrack)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sgt Pepper Film.jpg
Image:Sgt Pepper Film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

"Gold" return status
Supposedly the album was "Gold" in the number of copies returned by record stores back to distributors... AnonMoos (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

The album was referred to as going reverse gold or reverse platinum due to record stores ordering or had shipped to them far more than they were selling. Surely a reference can be found to verify this information or at least mention that it it is only a rumor.22yearswothanks (talk) 00:12, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Italic title?
I give up - how do we get the title to display as Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (soundtrack) ? GoingBatty (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Removed unnecessary and weasel-worded POV section.
I removed the following, which was its own section: Content The soundtrack for the movie was made up of all songs from the original Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album but also uses almost all songs from the album Abbey Road whose songs seem to be more memorably covered in the movie.

This paragraph hits the trifecta: It's unnecessary, it's a weaselly-worded statement of opinion, and it's bad writing. I don't like removing content, and I don't want to single any one contributor out! But framing an opinion with weasel-wording like "seem to be" strikes me as deliberate, a contributor doing what he knows is wrong.

What's up with the POV, anyway? Does anybody even care which of these songs are "more memorably covered" (or "better") than the others? A Bee Gees-dominated disco take on The Beatles is something you're either open to, or else you detest the very idea, and refuse to listen to it (even Aerosmith are guilty by association). I was born in 1971, and even at my very young age, I noticed the howls of outrage from the magazines and television. I think even Cracked had something to say about it!

Does anybody think it's really necessary to specifically inform the reader that the soundtrack "uses almost all songs" from Abbey Road? If it isn't already said elsewhere in the article (and I'll bet it is), I'll find a way to clearly and briefly mention it -- without the POV.

For some reason, I find "but also uses almost all songs from ..." undesirable, whereas something more like "and also includes nearly every song from ..." seems acceptable. Maybe it's "almost", a word with a childlike, amateurish flavor. (I once went on a rant about the term "portion" as applied to sections of a song.)

QUESTION: the album actually includes material from no less than five Beatles albums, not to mention the "Strawberry Fields Forever" single. Should those albums be explicitly listed?
 * --Ben Culture (talk) 23:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Sandy Farina circula link
The Sandy Farina link on this page redirects back to this page. Did a search and came back to this page. I am going to delete the link. Dannman (talk) 15:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC) Done. It was the first memtion of her name. Disc 1, side 1, track 2.Dannman (talk) 15:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

The original
Surely some mention of the original album upon which this (and the film) were based should be made in the text (not merely a mention in the link box out at the end of th article)? --82.21.97.70 (talk) 23:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)