Talk:Shōnen manga/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cessaune (talk · contribs) 17:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to review this article. Cessaune  [ talk ]   17:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry I'm taking so long. Will be finished in 2-3 days. Cessaune   [ talk ]   18:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Here we go. This is only the first half; the rest will be finished late tommorow (not a promise!)
 * 1. Well-written:
 * the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct ✅
 * Prose is good; some of the best writing I've read in a while. Rivals my favorite article :)
 * it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation ✅
 * Definitely does this.
 * 3. Broad in its coverage:
 * it addresses the main aspects of the topic ✅
 * Does this very well.
 * it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style) ✅
 * Covers everything in detail. There's a lot here, but it isn't too broad in its coverage.
 * 4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each ✅
 * Definitely seems to do so.
 * 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute ✅
 * 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
 * media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content ✅
 * media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
 * The images that are currently there are good, but I think an image of an actual page would be useful, considering that this is a broad article about the most popular category of manga.
 * There are some issues with the citations; I've got to verify a few of them. Cessaune   [ talk ]   02:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)