Talk:Shades of Purple/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 21:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * Corrected one typographical error
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * See below
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * Two album covers with fair use tags
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * All looks pretty good. A couple of questions below
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * Two album covers with fair use tags
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * All looks pretty good. A couple of questions below
 * Pass or Fail:
 * All looks pretty good. A couple of questions below

All looks pretty good. Just a couple of questions: Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * 1) When did Marion Ravn become Raven?
 * 2) I'm a little concerned about footnote 3. Was it once online?
 * Hi again . Thanks for this review as well. In response to your comments:
 * I'm not sure what you're saying here. Her birth name is Ravn, but she's always been known as Raven in English speaking countries, and accordingly her article on the English wikipedia is Marion Raven.
 * No. I got the article off ProQuest via my University's online library search function. I did note, however, that I made a mistage in the references page number, which I have now fixed. I can email you the reference in PDF format if you like.
 * Let me know if I need to do anything else. Freikorp (talk) 04:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That should do. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)