Talk:Shadow of Suribachi

Outside Review
In response to the editor who proposed this article for deletion, here is a review of the book by a third party: http://www.greenwood.com/catalog/C5063.aspx


 * I quote from WP:BK with regards to notability requirements: The book has been the subject[1] of multiple, non-trivial[2] published works whose sources are independent of the book itself,[3] with at least some of these works serving a general audience. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews. Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary.  Note the website does show two reviews there so likely this is enough. We should like reference the page on the article page...RP459 (talk) 20:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)