Talk:Shadows of Time

Assessment comments
Clearly more than Stub-class. As for B-class, I think it should be more comprehensive, preferably with more sources, but if a more experienced reviewer feels it is B-class, I'd have no objections. Is it considered proper to have an additional infobox for the sound track? I don't recall ever seeing that before. But again, I may be mistaken. decltype (talk) 04:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and I did not strike out the assessment request, to allow for a second opinion. decltype (talk) 04:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It could be a B-class after checking the b-switches. I would not touch grammar myself though. Agathoclea (talk) 09:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

B-Class review for WikiProject Films
This article has been checked against the project's criteria for B-Class status:


 * 1) Referencing and citation: Red x.svg criterion not met
 * No sources are provided for the "Awards" section.
 * 1) Coverage and accuracy: Red x.svg criterion not met
 * No coverage of the film's release or distribution.
 * 1) Structure: Green check.svg criterion met
 * 2) Grammar: Green check.svg criterion met
 * 3) Supporting materials: Green check.svg criterion met
 * 1) Supporting materials: Green check.svg criterion met
 * 1) Supporting materials: Green check.svg criterion met

PC78 (talk) 09:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)