Talk:Shagan (lake)

Merge?
Is there much point in having separate pages about the lake and the explosion that created it? The two seem so inextricably linked that there's no real difference between their subjects. I propose merging the lake article into the test article, leaving a redirect. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk

Sounds good to me. I think there's a bit of info here that's not in the test page (the glass), but otherwise they were identical. --Thatnewguy 05:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

The size of the lake differs between the two pages though. Which is the correct one ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.189.230.172 (talk) 11:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Shouldn't this page at least have a picture of the Chagan lake? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.45.142.73 (talk) 03:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Photo of Lake Chagan
Yes, there's should be a photo. But ones with the right licensing seem scarce.

dino (talk) 23:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

"Still radioactive", fine but how radioactive is it?
Is it approachable, can you swim in it, is it closed off, what is the exact value? Anybody know? 76.168.51.241 (talk) 17:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Purpose
Was this just a nuclear test or was it intended to create a reservoir? If so, was it for irrigation, drinking, or what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.144.207 (talk) 09:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Purpose
How credible are these reports?

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/russia-used-nuclear-bomb-create-11213915

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4905826/Clip-shows-Soviet-nuke-used-create-new-reservoir.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.144.207 (talk) 09:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)