Talk:Shaklee/Archives/2015

Consumerlabs.com report
I removed the ConsumerLab.com report section titled "reception". First, the section title was misleading, but more importantly, it was a routine study on dozens of supplements with no indication of greater significance to the company. If there were reliable WP:SECONDARY sources, it might make sense to reference this, but unless there is some specific, sourced reason to believe the company's products are fraudulently labeled, this information served only to promote the company (and the commercial lab that did the testing). This section was too promotional, and was WP:UNDUE as well. Grayfell (talk) 01:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Shaklee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150330020509/http://shaklee.rotary-potentiometers.com:80/ to http://shaklee.rotary-potentiometers.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 20:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)