Talk:Shamkir (city)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Şərur which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Şəmkir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325041935/http://www.sport24.az/onnews.php?id=7551 to http://www.sport24.az/onnews.php?id=7551

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 21 March 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved per consensus on WP:COMMONNAME and WP:USEENGLISH. Combefere ❯❯❯  Talk  11:32, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Şəmkir → Shamkir (city) – Move to "Shamkir (city)" per WP:UE/WP:COMMONNAME/WP:ENGLISH. Proof of anglicized name being the common name:

Results from Google News: Shamkir: 2,370 Şəmkir: 1

Results from Google Scholar: Shamkir: 510 Şəmkir: 102

Individual reliable sources referring to the city as Shamkir: Al Jazeera 1, Al Jazeera 2, Voice of America, Reuters, EurasiaNet, FinancialTimes, RFE/RL

This is the same name but an anglicized version. Unlike other small villages, this is a fairly large town, which has made a lot of appearances in English-language media, in most of which, "Shamkir" has been used much more, establishing its WP:COMMONNAME. I'd also like to ask the closing admin to give more attention to the arguments being made rather than the vote counts, as there are people who go over each RM and repeat unrelated policies as an "Oppose" argument. — CuriousGolden (T·C)  16:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose en.wp Azerbaijan articles use Azerbaijan script. same as this English book or this English book. Most sources don't have full fonts, unlike en.wp. So it's a choice we have made because we don't want to treat Azerbaijan differently from every other Latin-alphabet nation on en.wp - check out en.wp's Malta articles for example. Azerbaijan gets equal treatment with every other latin-alphabet country. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * We're not changing the name solely because it uses non-anglicized letters. The anglicized name is the common name as shown by a wide range of WP:RS and WP:GOOGLETEST provided above and Wikipedia policies and guidelines such as WP:UE, WP:ENGLISH and WP:COMMONNAME prefer an anglicized common name rather than an non-anglicized barely mentioned name. Nitpicking two books using a non-anglicized name as opposed to 510 scholarly books/articles and almost all WP:RS using "Shamkir" won't help your case either. — CuriousGolden (T·C)  18:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:BADGER. Please, you don't have to have always reply and always have last word with every single voice against your view. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Replying to people to clarify their misunderstanding of my RM intent isn't badgering (it would be if I was trying to make you change your vote) and it's quite ironic for you to mention it as you were doing the exact same thing few days ago here and here. — CuriousGolden (T·C)  18:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support - I've voted on similar RMs before and there are always unrelated policies and M.O.S. issues repeated. This, to me, seems to be a commonname issue and I'm convinced by the sufficient sourcing provided by CuriousGolden that the anglicised name is the commonname. Gnominite (talk) 14:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC) CU-confirmed sock, please see Sockpuppet investigations/CuriousGolden --Blablubbs&#124;talk 16:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per sourcing brought up by nominator. I'll buy that this is the common name given the substantially different hit counts, including in high quality sources like Google Scholar.  (Canvassing disclaimer to closer: These RMs were brought up in the Wikipedia Discord.) SnowFire (talk) 00:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. There seems no doubt that this is the more common name in English. My only question is, do we need to disambiguate both it and Shamkir District? Shamkir is a two-way DAB. But it does no harm, and this proposed move is an improvement either way. Andrewa (talk) 11:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Common name and Use English dictate a support Red   Slash  17:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Climate
Missing a climate designation דולב חולב (talk) 02:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)