Talk:Shan Wells

Untitled
Page has been replaced with information that satisfies the criteria for inclusion. Please notify why this should not be so.
 * Comment, I don't see how this meets WP:BIO criteria, but it is sourced now, so I've reinstated the importance tag, but removed the unverified tag. If you feel it meets WP:BIO, please indicate which criteria it meets.  I also reformatted the references to conform to standards and removed an unsourced statement (which I have no objection to you adding back in if you have a source for it).--Isotope23 16:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I see from the article's AfD that everyone had a problem with the article's sources and the notability of the subject. I also have a problem with those two things and I note that the article hasent improved much over the last 2 years.  Look at the respondents in the previous AfD, everyone said "weak keep" or "weak keep with extra weak", not exactly singing praise there. Bonewah (talk) 14:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)