Talk:Shaolin and Wu Tang

Fair use rationale for Image:Shaolin and Wu Tang.jpg
Image:Shaolin and Wu Tang.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Bad plot summary?
The description of the plot in the article does not resemble the film I've seen -- the film ends after the two students team up and defeat the Prince. There is no pool of acid, or anything subsequent (nor does everyone but these people die.) Up to this point, however, the films are similar. Are there different cuts of this film? (Also, discussion on IMDB suggests that other people have seen the version I saw. No one recalled a pool of acid.65.102.11.145 (talk) 21:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Notability?
This doesn't seem like a notable subject -- I don't see any references, and it seems likely that the plot summary was written by someone watching the movie and then writing a summary (rather than reference to reliable sources). Are there any third-party references to this film that would make it notable? Subverdor (talk) 04:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC)