Talk:Sharon Bialek

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because . &mdash; Spatrick89 (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because . &mdash; 67.167.138.186 (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because . &mdash; Chironares (talk) 21:42, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy declined, article redirected
Not the best candidate for speedy deletion, but a terrible candidate for an article right now given that as of this moment Bialek is clearly someone known for "one event," and a person who seems to be not otherwise notable in any way. I've left the page as a redirect to sub-section of Herman Cain presidential campaign, 2012 since Sharon Bialek is a plausible search term, but we can put everything we need to know about her there, or in a sub-article about this overall controversy, assuming that gets created at some point.

I would implore other editors to not recreate this nor to put it up for AfD--a redirect lets the reader find the info they'll want while keeping our options open and avoids a huge debate at a time when what we really need to do is wait and see what will happen next. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 21:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * What's really sad is that I already had the (at the time) redlink on watch, knowing full well that some would come here to mount a smear campaign. Tarc (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * That's fine with me. I guess the redirect makes more sense.  I just thought it was weird that wikipedia didn't have anything on her when you searched her name Spatrick89 (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)