Talk:Shaun Gladwell

Untitled
I'm reverting the recent edit because the new text is copied directly from http://www.shermangalleries.com.au/artists/inartists/artist_profile.asp?artist=gladwells and hence an apparent copyright violation. However, the nature of the edit makes it seem possible that User:203.202.150.10 might be from Sherman Galleries; if that's the case, they should make this clear and state whether they really want to release their text under the GFDL. Davepape 06:08, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * , this image matches as well as one that's on a dealer's site. What's interesting to me is that if it is the artist or dealer releasing the images via CC license, they are licensing them for free use and remix, which is usually something that an artist does not want! HappyValleyEditor (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Autobiography
Given the similarity of the user name that create the page and the article subject, and the fact that the image uploader claims images of the article subject as "own work", I am calling this an autobiography. (General question: why is it that artists are the worst offenders on COI?) HappyValleyEditor (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)